On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 11:24:39AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Much worse, there are a couple of cases where we had to NMU the > packages, either because the maintainers where inactive, or in one case > because he said "no time here, just go ahead". Except for this one case > this couldn't have been done with the packages in experimental, since > failing to cooperate with a package in experimental isn't RC, is it?
You can NMU for any bug in principle, not just for RC bugs. That's a common misconception, but the Developers Reference lists nothing about only RC bugs being candidates for NMU. Of course, on a typical BSP, those RC bugs are the focus, but especially bugs that will become RC in the future are worthwhile NMU candidates too. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]