On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 02:18:27AM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:47:32AM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > * Matthew Garrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Just to point out that as of Firefox/Thunderbird 2 the entire codebase > > > > > is triple licensed under the MPL, GPL and LGPL and any objection to > > > > > the MPL as far as Mozilla is concerned is fairly academic at this > > > > > point. > > > > > > > > Seriously? That's absolutely great. Is there any sort of announcement > > > > of > > > > this anywhere? > > > > > > Seriously: > > > http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/gerv/archives/2006/03/relicensing_complete.html. > > > > Actually, only the trunk has the relicensing complete, and the trunk is > > Firefox 3. Firefox 2 will still be in the same state as previous > > releases, but we know most of its code is available in upstream cvs in a > > really triple licensed form. > > Really? Gerv's post is incorrect?
Last time I checked (and it was after Gerv's post), the relicensing changes were still not applied to the MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH. Things seem to have changed, but that needs some checking. I took some random files to check and found out files that are not tri-licensed in the trunk, so... *sigh* Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]