On Wed, Dec 20, 2006, Bill Gatliff wrote: > For the faster arches, i.e. the ARM9 machines and above, I'm thinking > that we should stick with real hardware so there's no question that the > binaries will run properly.
Pardon me sir, but can that claim that binaries built on so-called "real hardware" will unquestionably run (as opposed to, if I understand correcly, binaries built on an emulated platform) be backed up by any facts, examples, experimentation results or scientific publication? Kindest regards, -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
