On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:02:49 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:23:38 +0200, Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>> Hi On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:23:28 +0200
>> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> If you encrypt to yourself, how is the voting system supposed to
>>> decrypt it?
>> It was encrypted for two keys, both of them can decrypt it.
> It turns out that it was indeed encrypted, but the message
> was
> not signed; which means there is no information about who is
> sending the ballot. This is a legitimate addition to the ballot;
> I'll point it out in the next CFV.
Hmm. Turns out, that ballot already mentioned that "you may, if
you wish, choose to send a signed, encrypted ballot". The operative
word is "signed", which the ballot in question was not.
manoj
--
No matter how good she looks, some other guy is sick and tired of
putting up with her shit. Men's Room, Linda's Bar and Grill. Chapel
Hill, North Carolina.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
