On 6/11/07, Alex Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fine. Stick with Kilobytes, but strictly define it as 10^3 bytes. Just
choose one over the other and be consistent.

That's not "consistent". Kilobyte has always meant 2^10 bytes. "kilo"
in "kilobyte" is not an SI prefix. SI prefixes only apply to SI
measurements, of which "byte" is not a member. There is no confusion;
the only place where a kilobyte != 2^10 bytes is in hard drive
manufacturer's advertising materials. This is the way it has been for
decades, and it is a perfectly acceptable and desirable standard.


On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 01:53 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> shirish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >     It isn't just ubuntu or debian but this needs to be done
> > everywhere.
>
> No it doesn't.
>
> The "SI binary prefixes" are an abomination.
>
> "Kibibytes"?  Christ...  [Did they try pronouncing these horrid things
> when "standarizing" them?!?]
>
> -Miles
>
> --
> We are all lying in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
> -Oscar Wilde
>
>
--
Alex Jones
http://alex.weej.com/


--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss



--
Mark Reitblatt


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to