On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:40:40AM +1000, Brian May wrote: >Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>My preference would be to dump the UMich GSSAPI library and >>link nfs-common directly against MIT Kerberos, which doesn't >>conflict with Heimdal.
No. There is a better solution, Brian has found that the MIT kerberos library was renamed. >So should I make the Heimdal GSSAPI library conflict with the UMich >GSSAPI library? > >It which case, does the UMich library also have to conflict with the >Heimdal GSSAPI library? > >I had a feeling I was told the conflicts had to appear in both >packages, but I can't remember why right now. > >Anyway, I see that MIT Kerberos has named their library: > >/usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 So, we only need versioned conflicts. Right? >Wouldn't this be a better solution then getting rid of the UMich >library? Yes. >-- >Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Best Regards, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar -- http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
