Hello, > I vaguely recall seeing a recommendation for library packages > for a particular language to follow libFOO-BAR naming convention > in Debian, where FOO is the name of a library, and BAR is an > arbitrary common suffix (thus, liberror-perl, or > libsqlite-ocaml.) > > Could one point me to where this recommendation is given?
In the perl policy document[0] it states: "Perl module packages should be named for the primary module provided. The naming convention for module Foo::Bar is libfoo-bar-perl. Packages which include multiple modules may additionally include provides for those modules using the same convention." HTH Jeremiah [0] http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/perl-policy/ch-module_packages.html#s-package_names -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
