On Monday 03 December 2007 05:11:35 am Tim Cutts wrote: > Well, am-utils lists as building broken packages, but when I looked at > the log, it was just that the parallel build had produced the multiple > binary packages in a different order from the serial build. At least, > that's my interpretation of the following from debdiff: > > Files moved or copied from at least TWO packages or to at least TWO > packages > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >- -rw-r--r-- root/root DEBIAN/control > From packages: am-utils-doc, am-utils, libamu4, libamu-dev > To packages: am-utils-doc, libamu4, libamu-dev, am-utils > -rw-r--r-- root/root DEBIAN/md5sums > From packages: am-utils-doc, am-utils, libamu4, libamu-dev > To packages: am-utils-doc, libamu4, libamu-dev, am-utils > -rwxr-xr-x root/root DEBIAN/postinst > From packages: am-utils-doc, am-utils, libamu4 > To packages: am-utils-doc, libamu4, am-utils > -rwxr-xr-x root/root DEBIAN/postrm > From packages: am-utils, libamu4 > To packages: libamu4, am-utils > > Or does that mean something more basic that's wrong with the packages?
The relevant difference is actually: Control files of package am-utils: lines which differ (wdiff format) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends: libamu4 (= 6.1.5-7), portmap, {+libamu4,+} libc6 (>= 2.6.1-1), libgdbm3, libhesiod0, libldap2 (>= 2.1.17-1), libwrap0, perl, debconf (>= 1.2.0), ucf, debianutils (>= 1.6) So the Depends line got changed in the parallel build. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]