On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 07:10:55PM -0600, William Pitcock wrote: > > I agree with this. Additionally, Balasz Schielder (Balabit) makes people > who contribute to syslog-ng sign a contributory license agreement [1], > so that they can be included in syslog-ng premium, which is in my view > against the whole purpose of open source. If you disagree with signing > the CLA, your patch is rejected. As such, I feel that syslog-ng is not a > good choice for the default syslogd in Debian. > > rsyslog upstream have a fairly good reputation of being cooperative and > generally good to work with, at least from what i have observed. >
What about first hand experiences with them in heavy-load production environments? Stability, etc. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]