Quoting Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Paul Wise wrote: > > Perhaps in future mass ITPs could be mostly filed with only one to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the rest to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead? > > That would defeat a lot of the purpose of the ITPs (like looking at the > descriptions, etc). I think we just have to deal with it, they are not as
There is indeed no chace that a normal human can look at all descriptions of the gazillions of ITP that are currently flooding -devel (and I'm not only talking about Rafael ones here). There seems to be some crazyness about packaging new stuff these days. That would be fine.....if only our existing packages were well maintained.....which, for many of them is certainly not true. If someone cares to listen: when you think about ITPing each and every piece of FLOSS that pops around: think about *helping* people who maintain existing packages instead of adding even more noise to our noisy bunch of various crap^W software.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
