On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 03:47 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > The current binNMU numbering scheme was selected explicitly to allow > security uploads to sort later by numbering as > <last_version>+<release><serial>; e.g., 1.2-5.1+etch1.
That makes sense, although doesn't seem to match current practice. Was any consideration given as to where NMUs of native packages should sort? (I realise that they're the only case that doesn't automagically dtrt with respect to the numbering scheme). Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
