On 2008-05-02, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 07:36:25PM +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote: >> Yes. But after I have seen Laszlo Boszormenyi bughandling in sqlite3, I >> think I actually would prefer current maintainance of gnupg. >>=20 >> 478980 and 478337 > > Whatever it might have happened on those 2 bug reports, which I haven't > read, I find really annoying your public blaming behaviour.
Didn't this thread by the way more or less start with public blaming of current gnupg maintainer? > Either step > in and offer help or shut up. gnupg is a a bit too important package to be maintained by just anyone. I wouldn't have objected if it was unimportant leaf package - as all people have to start somewhere in learning packaging. This is why I am not shutting up. I hope most people will speak up publically in such cases. [1] - oh - and about offering to help: I was so far the one filed the "should this package be orphaned"-bug against gnupg. And I am planning to follow up on that. (476418) /Sune [1] I am not blaming people for introducing bugs. That can happen. The issue is how people handle it and tries to fix it up. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]