On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 08:09 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Do, 15 Mai 2008, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > No. Any key who had a single DSA signature created by the flawed version of > > OpenSSL should be considered compromised. DSA requires a secret, random > > Does this extend to gpg keys and its signatures? That would make quite > an impact.
The DSA said no. kk > > Best wishes > > -- Karl Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
