2008/5/16 martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Please Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] on this thread!
Done. > also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.05.16.1654 +0100]: >> Add to this that each patch should have some standardized header on top >> stating: >> - a description of the patch and its purpose >> - the associated bug number >> - who wrote the patch >> - where it has been forwarded upstream >> - sign-off by reviewers maybe >> >> Someone recently posted an example of this. IMO we should write a DEP >> on patch management and standardize those headers. And probably enforce >> their usage for patches on sensitive packages (lintian checks?). Just for the record, I totally agree with Raphael. I guess this would be something very useful to have and quite an improvement on the situation. Greetings, Miry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
