On 11454 March 1977, Charles Plessy wrote: >>> *) I assume that the priority of -dbg packages is extra >> s/I assume that// >> s/$/!/
> Does it mean that not being extra is a bug, that the persons with > write access to the `override' file will systematicly set the priority > of -dbg packages to `extra', or both? Both. And they should be extra, unless i missed some when doing it months ago (or if one of us missed it during NEW processing). > How can we document all of this better? Would a bug against the Policy > be appropriate? Sure. -- bye, Joerg <vorlon> since anyone who can get along with elmo must *surely* be part of the cabal. <Overfiend> vorlon: Not true. I've gotten along with elmo from time to time. We're just both ashamed of it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]