On Wed, Oct 08 2008, Reinhard Tartler wrote:

> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Do you see a particular problem with requiring that?
>>
>>         Yes. I think main should remain self contained.  This is the
>>  same reason we have a contrib section -- packages in contrib can not be
>>  built with the software contained in main.
>
> Depending on the requirements of ftp-master, which *seem* to think that
> non-free were inappropriate for this kind of packages, my proposal tries
> to address that by introducing a new archive section.
>
> I am aware that this is against our current technical policy. If my
> proposal indeed adresses the concerns correct and we can implement it
> technically, we'd need to adjust the policy as well.

        You misunderstand. I think the current policy is correct; and
 main should always be self contained. If you put stuff into a different
 archive, you need to split the source packages too (like we do the gfdl
 docs).

        So I think we need to modify the proposal, not the policy.

        manoj

-- 
Live and learn... Die and forget it all.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to