El sáb, 25-10-2008 a las 18:32 +0200, Adeodato Simó escribió: > * Francis Tyers [Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:25:47 +0200]: > > > Yep, this is the case, it includes pre-compiled regular expressions and > > these appear to be incompatible between versions of pcre. > > Ok. > > > [...snip...] > > > > > then set a Depend in the language packages to that > > > > particular version of apertium, then recompile and upload the packages. > > > > The option that sounds more realistic, at least for now, is having the > > > language packages Depend: libpcre3 (<< next_upstream_version), or > > > something along the lines. > > > We've come up with a better solution, which is to add dependencies to > > the apertium package, and then make the apertium package depend on a > > particular version of pcre3. It's safer this way, as I can't find out > > anything about compatibility of precompiled regular expressions in pcre > > between versions, so better to assume they aren't. > > Add what dependencies to the apertium package? Can you be specific?
Heh, actually there is an ambiguity there... I should have spotted it. What I mean is: Add the specific dependence in each language package to apertium and not to libpcre3. The language packages already depend on apertium, but we'll just make this specific with substvar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
