On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Luke,
hiya thomas. > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> * build.py would be... ohh... perhaps something like... autoconf. > Not more like make? .... *hand-waving* :) >I never called pyjs directly. me only for _really_ obscure stuff / demo purposes. >> my question, therefore, is: where in hell's name should these files >> be installed???? >> * pyjs.py is obvious: it goes into /usr/bin/pyjs.py > I wouldn't unless one needs to call it directly. Also, lose the .py for > stuff in /usr/bin ack. >> * pyjslib.py i have absolutely NO clue about. >> /usr/share/pyjamas/library/pyjslib.py ? >> /usr/lib/pyjs/library/pyjslib.py ? >> * DOM.py and ui.py etc. i have NO clue. >> /usr/share/pyjamas/library/pyjamas/DOM.py ui.py Window.py etc. ? >> /usr/lib/pyjs/pyjamas/DOM.py ? > These (both "*"s) should all go somewhere under /usr/share/pyjamas. > share vs. lib is whether the files are *arch*-dependent, which they are not. oh, is that what the difference is? :) >> that being the case, someone needs to "invent" a standard location >> where all libraries contained as part of the pyjamas "package", and >> all FUTURE libraries which depend, in future, on the pyjamas compiler, >> are to be installed. > > Well, the question I'd have is whether pyjamas really is stable enough > to go into unstable. suuure :) as stable as can be, with MS changing the bloody user-agent string in IE7. well if FreeBSD can turn 0.3 into a release, then what the heck. but yes - there has to be a 0.3.1 release before pyjamas can be packaged: the recent change in the IE user-agent string from "MSIE 7" to "MSIE7" causes pyjamas 0.3 to fallback to "old mozilla" which is a bit of a screw-up. >> can anyone come up with any good ideas? > > For the most part, you seem to have figured it all out already. random guesses ha ha thanks for the kicks in the right direction. l. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]