Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:53:00AM +0100, Adeodato Simó a écrit : > > No, not really. My point is: "*some* of the people whose packages have > binary stanzas in debian/control which contain the correct set of binary > dependencies at the beginning of the build, are unhappy about having to > write said set twice".
Hi Adeodato and everybody, I do not know who is unhappy; for me, it is more like it is itchy :) At the beginning I thought that skipping the depandancy needed for build-time tests was a logical extension, but now we all agree that it is useless. For the factorisation of the package list between Depends and Build-Depends, I will solve this in my packages with a dpkg substvar, such as $(depends:libfoo-bar-perl} for Foo::Bar. It seems that it is trivial to pass through dh_gencontrol. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
