Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 16 février 2009 à 22:33 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit : >> "current" is also useful to only provide a public module for just the default >> version. I'm unsure what you mean with when talking about the above mentioned >> "issue" > > Is it a joke? If you don’t know what this is about, why are you even > talking about python packaging? Were you even reading the discussions on > the Python policy when there have been some? > > "current" does not mean anything, semantically, especially for public > modules/extensions. There is a set of supported versions, and that’s > all. For extensions, it is the set of versions the extension has been > built against, and for modules, it is the set of versions the module can > work with. In neither of these cases does "current" mean anything.
But it does mean something. Modules which build from C sources have to be built for each version it wants to support, right? Maybe "current" is an arbitrary, unjustified choice, but it means that C modules which only build once don't will only work with that version. -- Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
