On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 04:44:08PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > Now, this has its own set of problems and caveats as well, since > > if you don’t pay attention and take care of later cleanup, you end > > up with packages in testing that do not belong to any source in > > testing, which is bad. > > Will there be reports produced on a regular basis of the stale > libraries in testing, and their reverse-dependencies, so that people > can easily pitch in to help with this later cleanup?
Even better would be to turn this report into a set of bugs filed against the set of reverse dependencies which are made RC at the time that the transition migrates. [I'm personally slightly concerned about relaxing britney allowing testing to get into unreleasable states; a flag to re-enable the old behavoir late in release would probably be good.] Don Armstrong -- I leave the show floor, but not before a pack of caffeinated Jolt gum is thrust at me by a hyperactive girl screaming, "Chew more! Do more!" The American will to consume more and produce more personified in a stick of gum. I grab it. -- Chad Dickerson http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org