Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org> (14/04/2009): > there are some news from the autobuilding front that may be of your > interest:
o< > State of the software packages used on the buildds > ================================================== > > This is part of the plan to unify those buildds to use one common set > of software, instead of every buildd admin using the one sbuild/buildd > combination he inherited from someone. Thanks for doing so (and by following buildd-tools-de...@l.a.d.o, I can tell it's keeping you quite busy :)). > Old bits > ======== > > I would like to communicate again the current addresses for > wanna-build- related requests as already sent to -project by Adeodato > Simó[1]: > > | Regarding requests for give-backs, etc., this is the new state of > | things: > | > | * Packages-arch-specific: still bug against ‘buildd.debian.org’ > | > | * Bin-NMUs: still debian-rele...@lists.debian.org > | > | * Chroot problems, package priority issues: still > <arch>@buildd.debian.org > | > | * Give-backs and dep-waits: debian-wb-t...@lists.debian.org > | (including requests for experimental, but please mark them as such) Wouldn't it make sense to have this documented on both websites (that is: {release,buildd}.d.o)? Having to dig the mailing list archives or ones =debian-project mbox every time to make sure to use the right address (not to mention the syntax :p) is a bit suboptimal. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature