On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:36:16PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Do you think that limitation is enough to change from one ddeb per source > package? Should we maybe allow any number of ddebs, and only build one ddeb in > the common case? Or allow both one ddeb per source package and one per binary > package?
Well, it happen to me frequently to have the same source packages building different (OCaml) libraries called lib{foo,bar,...}-ocaml-{,dev}. Ideally, I would like to have one -dbg package per library, but it is not really an important requirement. If the user is asked to install a -dbg package to do debugging, size constraints are usually of secondary importance and one package containing debugging info for all libraries doesn't look like a problem in my use cases. Thanks for the feedback. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature