* Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org>, 2009-08-11, 22:24:
> Not necessarily. Any sane implementation should just use wchar_t
Which could be UTF16 and therefore still has complicatd length semantics.
No, wchar_t is UCS-4 (or UCS-2 in esoteric implementations like
Windows).
And in the most esoteric (while still conforming to the C standard)
implementations it is not related to Unicode at all.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
