On Sep 04, Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org> wrote: > Why do you not extend the current setup to do another step? Currently we Even if this were possible at all, it would require (for a start): - working out all the possible side effects of synthesizing all/most (which ones?) events a second time - having to forward port these changes forever, with the possibility of a new architectural change making the exercise useless at any time
This is a development albatross which I do not need, and Debian neither.
> You could just add another ("change") trigger run after all filesystems
> are available. (Okay, this extra names must not be used in the fstab at
> all then.)
No reason to bother then, persistent names are indispensable for many
non-trivial systems.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
