-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Goirand skrev: >> Surely you are aware of the huge controversy around Ext JS licensing.
> Hell, I missed it. Oh well :-) > This doesn't appear at all on the license.txt. Do you > think I could still package it for the non-free archive? I don't know. But your first remark illustrates one problem with their licensing policies - they are simply unclear and ambiguous, and by now one must assume that it is intentional. For example it is not clear what it means to license something under GPL "with strings attached". It seems (to me) that their interpretation is that users who get Ext under the GPL will *not* be able to redistribute it freely, likewise under the GPL. (In fact that would circumvent their whole "dual-licensing" policy.) Cheers, Marcus -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrMoi0ACgkQXjXn6TzcAQmf3gCfUEP6rXAiJ8/sFpEaK6y+IzdF ksMAn2rSvjEYAJm8np2RyDmEDYyeygms =E9zo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
