-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Russ Allbery schrieb: > Rodrigo Gallardo <[email protected]> writes: > >> I could just put up a site with CC porn, then. Aren't we supposed not >> to discriminate against fields of endeavour? > > The package description strongly implies that gnaughty works only with one > specific porn index or download service, which is presumably non-free. If > this is not the case, the proposed package description should be fixed. >
Seems like the description has to be fixed, there is no pay-only content and it has included some more download sources, not only one "vendor". But also if the _free_ software is for downloading etc. pay-only content like music, I do not think that it has to enter contrib, because it does not has got a real dependenie on non-free stuff. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected] Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkrWKoAACgkQ2XA5inpabMeZyACdFCpTQT3chGiIDe/PCW7suFZp VH0An2/RGLmmRJ1sPLj7stejUt92CVNX =UUsG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

