On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 21:53, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> wrote: > Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> writes: > >> So, three months are passed since the last email to the original thread >> and 1 week from this last ping, and there are still no public >> information about the "currently discussion ongoing about how to move >> forward". > >> Nice, let's keep this hidden, so that only the secret cabal knows about >> it, and the Debian community can be kept in the dark. Way to go. > > A bunch of work towards a Python 2.6 transition seems to be happening > (says someone who doesn't use much Python but who fixed reported bugs with > Python being built against 2.6 by default in a package upload a week ago).
yes, that's right: a huge amount of work was done by people from debian-python. > Maybe the group of people doing that work should also be the people who > decide when Python 2.6 will be uploaded, if the current maintainer isn't > able or willing to coordinate the work for whatever reason? Yes, that would be awesome in theory, still quite difficult (or seen as rude) in reality. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8b2d7b4d1003081603v42485829x51bca1fd7084d...@mail.gmail.com
