]] Christian Perrier [...]
| The next debate to have will come when it's time to change the default | behaviour of dpkg-source. That debate has been mixed into the current | discussion and is probably what makes it quite hairy.... It is very | obviously controversial to decide when to change the default behaviour | of such a key tool and I think that dpkg maintainers are probably | slightly wrong to say that *they* will change the default at some | moment in the future. Given that what we are talking about is switching from «1.0 is implicit» to «version is explicit», I don't think it makes much sense to ever switch the default version for dpkg-source. However, making it warn and then eventually fail if you don't declare which version your package is is something I think makes sense. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r5n4hlul....@qurzaw.linpro.no