> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 11:46:23 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > (To actually statically link without the .la (or with an .la 'mangled' > > to empty the dependency_libs field) largely amounts to reconstructing > > the information that was in the .la originally. That should be > > sufficient disincentive to try to statically link at all. Hence, is it > > worth wasting archive space on the inevitably much larger .a files?) > > Static linking is resolved by providing a foo.pc file so that > "pkg-config --static --libs foo" is all that's needed to find the right > libs.
This does not clarify the question about dependences. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201005021530.38...@blacky.localdomain
