Daniel Burrows <dburr...@debian.org> writes:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Bjørn Mork <bj...@mork.no> was
> heard to say:
>> Pierre Habouzit <madco...@madism.org> writes:
>> > This is bullshit. It's *VERY* easy to "support" pipelining: parse one
>> > request at a time, and until you're done with a given request, you just
>> > stop to watch the socket/file-descriptor for reading (IOW you let the
>> > consecutive request live in the kernel buffers).
>>
>> Yeah, you make it sound easy. I'm sure those writing proxy servers are
>> just stupid.
>
> There are lots of easy features that my own software doesn't support,
> and I don't think I'm particularly stupid. It just means I have less
> than an infinite amount of time.
>
> Daniel
That isn't a problem. The problem arises when you start to support the
feature but mess it up.
Processing pipelined requests one by one is easy but slow. Processing
them in parallel is hard but faster. But please do make sure it works
before you do. :)
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y6ffmbka....@frosties.localdomain
