On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 02:35, Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it> wrote:
> On Jun 28, Mike Hommey <m...@glandium.org> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, as xpcom is guaranteed forward compatible but not
>> backwards compatible, some plugins and extensions, once built against
>> xulrunner 1.9.2, are likely to not work in iceape 2.0 anymore. This
>> would leave iceape users with a bitter aftertaste. Alternatively,
> And how would this be worse than shipping a version of iceweasel which
> is already obsolete? Who actually cares about iceape?

I would say I care, but I use Mozilla nightlies straight from ftp.mozilla.org...
But if current stable doesn't have iceape, anyone on stable that wants it
must be doing something else anyway, so I'm not sure it's that big a deal.


Cheers,
Kelly Clowers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktili6xjjh5ckitbdcdj3hipmnvo8r37bjynto...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to