Am 02.07.2010 08:57, schrieb Joerg Jaspert: >>> The above URL has the license. I think that the concepts in the preamble >>> are >>> interesting, offering software to please Allah and denying the concept of >>> "ownership" of Intellectual Property. >> Which is not only non-free in Debian, we can not distribute it. >> A software license is not allowed to force other users to please any "god". > > Yes, we can very well distribute a software in non-free that requires > the user to do whatever funny thing the license author wants from him. > It is the users problem in non-free if they can follow that or > not. Debian does only require the distribution rights, and I do not see > how they are affected in such a thing. How much sense it makes and what > I personally think of license authors (hint: nothing good at all, DO NOT > WRITE ANY NEW LICENSE, DAMNIT), is something else. >
Okay thanks for the correctur :)
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
