"Steve M. Robbins" <st...@sumost.ca> writes: > I wouldn't place any of Boost in that category. In fact, I wouldn't > place "aptitude" in that category, either.
aptitude was historically the recommended tool to use for upgrades because it had the best dependency resolver for handling the dist-upgrade case. For so long as that's true, it should be priority: important, which means that by definition the things that it requires are also priority: important or higher. If apt-get is now strong enough that we can recommend it for upgrades without qualms, then aptitude is another alternative package manager and standard may be fine. Is that now the case? -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y6dc83h9....@windlord.stanford.edu
