On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: > Steve Langasek, le Tue 04 Jan 2011 09:34:45 -0800, a écrit : >> I don't agree. dpkg doesn't need to care that /usr/lib/libm.so really >> unpacks to /lib/libm.so due to /usr -> / symlink, > > dpkg doesn't care, but shlibdeps does care, hurd-i386 has been bitten by > that enough to make us give up with /usr -> /.
What's the rationale for getting rid of /usr? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=8pbwb2b7dgdlhd1gpa=7sf_rqtgtmn_vzu...@mail.gmail.com
