Hi, if one manages two versions of a software : 2.0, the latest, which goes to experimental and 1.0.x, still maintained by upstream, going to unstable.
What's the best way to name gbp branches ? I thought of something like : 2.0 1.0.x master master-1.0.x upstream upstream-1.0.x pristine-tar pristine-tar-1.0.x is there some common practice ? Regards, Jérémy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d54f755.6010...@melix.org
