Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 10:29 +0100, Benjamin Drung a écrit : > I favor a combination of idea one and two, which is: Keep 3.5 in > unstable and push the last 4.0 betas/rc to experimental. Push 4.0 to > unstable when it's out. > > Then we have one big break and a tested 4.0 in unstable.
I’d favor that one too. The sooner we can adapt reverse dependencies to 4.0 in experimental, the better. And no need to do the work twice. -- .''`. : :' : “You would need to ask a lawyer if you don't know `. `' that a handshake of course makes a valid contract.” `- -- J???rg Schilling -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1298030386.18394.65.camel@meh
