On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 07:53:34PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote: > > So basicly apt-file search will fail to find any file in > > inorwegian and wnorwegian? > > It won't find any files currently for both packages.
$ apt-file search bokmaal.aff inorwegian: /usr/lib/ispell/bokmaal.aff $ apt-file search bokmål.aff inorwegian: /usr/lib/ispell/bokmål.aff Seems to work fine? > > Why? What's wrong with the old way of doing it? > > Both packages ship symlinks with the same name but different > encodings. Some weeks ago there have been some discussion about > Unicode correctness in Debian. I think that we should accept only > properly UTF-8 encoded filenames in the future but I am open for > discussion. We can use a manual workaround for (old)stable if we want > that. I think there might be some misunderstanding of what you mean. My understanding from the original mail was: some packages ship /usr/sbin/sendmail, currently that seems to be: citadel-mta: /usr/sbin/sendmail courier-mta: /usr/sbin/sendmail dma: /usr/sbin/sendmail esmtp-run: /usr/sbin/sendmail exim4-daemon-heavy: /usr/sbin/sendmail exim4-daemon-light: /usr/sbin/sendmail masqmail: /usr/sbin/sendmail msmtp-mta: /usr/sbin/sendmail nullmailer: /usr/sbin/sendmail postfix: /usr/sbin/sendmail sendmail-base: /usr/sbin/sendmailconfig ssmtp: /usr/sbin/sendmail xmail: /usr/sbin/sendmail And as a result for all those packages you would list no file at all. But then my understanding changed so that a single package shipping a file which has different encodings for the filename would not have that (or any) file mentioned. If you already convert them all to utf-8, I see no problem in only mentioning that file once instead of not at all. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110312192835.ga6...@roeckx.be