On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:59:51PM +0000, Clint Adams wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:04:20PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> > What do others think of moving bash to important (required and important >> > are part of the base system)? >> >> I think that this is a great idea. > > Likewise. > > Regarding the root shell issue, I wouldn't have an issue with it > being /bin/sh. The admin is always free to chsh it to the shell > of their choice. > > [Slightly related: it would be nice if d-i could default to > password-free locked root account for wheezy, i.e. sudo by default, > which would partly mitigate the issue by not requiring the use of a > root shell for most uses of the root account.]
I really really disagree... In case of disaster running under root is essential. Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktik_bddvqqrkz8ke_8mh_tcus_+...@mail.gmail.com
