On Dec 6, 1997, at 16:56, Fabrizio Polacco wrote: > Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Personally, I still think that reply-to is a bad solution; > > I agree. > > > The people with sad mail software and lazy fingers are > > penalizing the people with low bandwidth. Don't break conforming > > software to cater to broken software. > > Are we sure that we giving the right answers to Gonzalo's problem?
I don't think so.; the right answer would be "Let's use Reply-To!"... 8) > I received his post about "Re: linux/unix to NT" twice (only his): > > one had the headers: > > Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by templinux.bucknell.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) > id VAA07482; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 21:19:26 -0500 > Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 21:19:26 -0500 > Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 18:13:06 -0300 > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Resent-Message-ID: <"y-M46C.A.OzB.lGMh0"@templinux> > X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/513 > > while the other: > > Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by newton.nowhere.cl (8.8.5/8.8.5) > id SAA01886; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 18:13:06 -0300 > Resent-Date: 3 Dec 1997 02:12:33 -0000 > Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 18:13:06 -0300 > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Resent-Message-ID: <"V_NgkD.A.M7B.RAMh0"@debian> > X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/11843 > > > That messages took two different paths and were distributed by two > different servers (is templinux.bucknell.edu our list backup or is a > NNTP/SMTP gateway ? ) > Has Gonzalo a newsfeed serving debian-devel? Nope. This looks like an altogether different problem. > fabrizio -- Gonzalo Diethelm # Windows 95: n. 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for [EMAIL PROTECTED] # a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally =Debian Linux= # coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit www.debian.org # company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .