]] Ben Hutchings (Cc list trimmed)
| On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 09:05 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: | | > Lack of Requires.private is no indicator of a lack of support for | > --static. There are many libraries which could link statically but | > which have no need for any data in Requires.private. | [...] | | Libs.private = -fstatic-linking-is-not-supported Yeah, something like that is really what you'd end up with. People aren't going to read the docs anyway, but if somebody sends me a patch for the man page or guide wording, I'll be happy to apply it. Not sure I care enough about static linking to write it myself, as I think static linking is an uninteresting corner case and people should just stop doing it. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
