On Monday, May 02, 2011 12:26:05 PM Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:48:27AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Monday, May 02, 2011 07:31:31 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > ... > > > > > How we deal with freezes is the hard point in this discussion. I'm > > > personnally in favor of the "freeze rolling for 3 months, then fork > > > frozen and unfreeze rolling" plan, though it has some problems too > > > (it is not clear whether the required manpower really decreases at > > > the end of freezes). > > > > - How do we allow for more parallel transitions so that rolling can > > actually roll. > > > > The first two points have gotten a lot of discussion. The third one, not > > so much. > > I think PPAs can be used to fix that. IIRC that was one of the reasons > they were brought into discussions in the first place last year (or > whenever that was). Weren't they?
I think that's the theory, but AFAIK no one has sat down and mapped out how the whole process would work. If Debian is going to have a true rolling release then someone needs to invest time in this. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105021337.42679.deb...@kitterman.com