On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:49:46PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > I tentatively think the idea is good; I don't really care about the > > name :)
> > The problem might be that the set of packages is not > > trivial/uncontroversial; I'm not sure I need cdbs (or cmake), I've > > never heard about bzr-builddeb, I miss cowbuilder (and also > > svn-buildpackage and git-buildpackage, and maybe dh-make) ... So yes, > > the idea is interesting, but the selection of packages might need > > some consideration :) > Then let's put the uncontroversial into Depends, the common (this needs > discussion) into Recommends and the others into Suggests. > Here's the starting point for discussion: > Depends: > build-essential > debhelper > devscripts > gnupg > lintian > dput | dupload > quilt > ubuntu-dev-tools (only on Ubuntu) > pbuilder | cowbuilder ^^ you mean sbuild. Happy to inject a little controversy ;) Though honestly I don't think I'm a target user for this package anyway, so I'm not sure you should care what I consider to be the standard developer tools. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
