On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 13:10 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Svante Signell <svante.sign...@telia.com> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > Tried to google but did not find any useful so far. I have a package I'm > > porting, and want to create one out of two binary packages from the > > source. Is there an easy way to achieve this, e.g. by an override > > statement. Or is brute force, removing all entries of that binary > > package in debian/rules, useful? Any other way to do this, by > > architecture checks? The Architecture entry seems to be all or any only, > > and Depends does not fit either. > > > > Thanks! > > The architecture can be just some archs too. But that is often something > the rules file then has to take into consideration too. If you have a > source that builds part of its packages only on some arch then this is > your answere.
Thank you for your reply. Is it possible to use the negative form too in the debian/control file? Package: ntp Architecture: !hurd-any (instead of any) Depends: ... Package: ntpdate Architecture: any ... Package: ntp-doc Architecture: all ... And then change the corresponding parts of debian/rules? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1307708053.22466.181.ca...@s1499.it.kth.se
