On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:55:58 +0100, Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote: >No, I don't think so. If these external tools double fork then they >are just wrong.
Double Forking has been the right way to do it for decades. Demanding from upstreams that they change their software this fundamentally to cater for a new init system is as unrealistic as demanding from upstreams to stay around snooping for new IP addresses that came online after the daemon was started to cater for IPv6. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qkarf-00049e...@swivel.zugschlus.de
