* Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net) [110831 10:56]: > Also, in the case of architectures targetted at embedded systems (I'm > thinking about mips and mipsel), what is important is that Debian > infrastructure supports the development of those architectures, but I > don't think that there's much to gain by being officially supported if > it's only used in production through derivatives that can provide the > official support.
You are aware that there are mipsel netbooks? And arm tablets? There is hardware running standard Debian, and that's one of the large advantages of Debian. I don't want to give that up. > hurd-i386, kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 are probably too > experimental to be used on production systems. For kfreebsd, my main > problem (with my Ruby hat) is the linuxthreads-based thread library, but > there might be other problems. I know people who put kbsd on edge firewalls because it's way easier for a standard linux / debian admin. And please don't put hurd-i386 in the same camp as kbsd. They're not. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110831093558.gj15...@mails.so.argh.org
