Kyle Willmon writes ("Re: Introducing Build-Recommends / Build-Core-Depends?"):
> So, if you think it's ok to leave out the words "Depends" and
> "Recommends", the logical idea would be to use "Build-Stage1" (though I
> do not think this is the correct route. I, personally, am in favor of
> "Build-Depends-Stage1")Sorry to join the bikeshed discussion, but: AIUI there are packages which need three build stages to bootstrap. So the field name ought to have a number "1" so that those packages can have "2". Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20090.2201.569800.902...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
