>>>>> Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it> writes: […]
> So let's look at the reasons against merging /usr in / listed in my > final summary. All of them do not apply to merging / in /usr, and > actually become arguments in favour of doing it: > - NFS: sharing a read only system over NFS becomes much easier (I > would say that it actually becomes possible...) Agreed. Being one who actually have experimented with such a setup, I'd say that it makes an NFS boot environment much easier to maintain. […] However, please note that the current state of affairs (AIUI) is that we rely on / to check all the other filesystems before these are mounted. If the / filesystem is itself modified in the process, we're to reboot the system for safety. With /usr being mounted by initramfs, either we'd need to allow /usr to be checked /after/ it's mounted (by the filesystem checkers residing on it, which doesn't seems all that sane), /or/ we'd need to put all the filesystem checkers to initramfs. This implies that the latter would've to be updated each time a new filesystem check program is added to (and, perhaps, removed from) the system. […] -- FSF associate member #7257 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/86k48a26n7.fsf...@gray.siamics.net