On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > On 01/17/2012 01:44 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:14:26PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> >>> FTR given that I got no reports of problems with DEP-3, that it's already >>> well established, I just changed the state of the DEP-3 from CANDIDATE >>> to ACCEPTED. >>> >>> Of course this does not mean that the DEP-3 can't be extended or improved >>> (in particular when it doesn't break backwards compatibility) >>> but it does mean that this format is ready for widespread usage. Use it to >>> document the patches that you add to Debian packages: >>> http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ >>> >> +1 for moving this to accepted. >> > Steve, since you're marked as "|Drivers" at: > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ > > could you tell what's blocking DEP5 status from > switching to ACCEPTED? Are there any more ongoing > discussions on it?
Yes one question do I need to document aclocal.m4 copyright patchwork ? > Cheers, > > Thomas > > P.S: Hoping that Raphael wont mind too much that > I'm a bit hijacking his thread! :) > > | > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f148bab.7010...@debian.org > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAbJRzecQBxjjNhkm+KqqJDbMjoBjoW_=qlqghxzq77...@mail.gmail.com