Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> writes: > On 01/18/12 06:25, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> What df should do is automatically skip the entries that are obscured or >> generally inaccessible. > > Isn't this missing some of the larger context? df is just doing what > lots of other programs do: finding out what file systems one has, > and reporting statistics on them. It sounds suboptimal to require > the maintainers of all these programs (coreutils, nautilus, etc.) > to rewrite their apps to deal with obscured entries. Surely it would > be better to have the kernel ordinarily return just the ordinary entries, > and to return obscured entries only when they are specially requested. > That way, this issue would be isolated to the few bits of code that really > want to see obscured entries.
+1. Kernel knows best anyway. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877h0o9fr1.fsf@frosties.localnet